YNAO OpenIR  > 射电天文研究组
脉冲星相干消色散与非相干消色散的比较研究
其他题名Comparative Study on the Coherent De-dispersion and Incoherent De-dispersion of Pulsar Signal
黄玉祥
学位类型硕士
导师汪敏
2018-07-01
学位授予单位中国科学院大学
学位授予地点北京
学位专业天文技术与方法
关键词脉冲星信号 相干消色散 非相干消色散 定量比较
摘要自从1967年第一颗脉冲星被发现以来,其极端的物理状态和精准的周期信号一直是我们的关注的重点,而脉冲星的周期性信号是当前获取脉冲星的信息的唯一媒介。在经过星际介质到达我们的观测设备时,脉冲星信号会发生色散。要想获得脉冲星的原始信号,必须对观测到的脉冲星信号进行消色散,这可以提高脉冲星计时精度。当前的消色散方法有两种:相干消色散和非相干消色散。非相干消色散是基于时间序列,用滤波器组分通道,平移单个通道对应的时域序列进行消色散;相干消色散在频域上,利用星际介质的传输函数实现整个观测通带内的消色散。 从原理上讲,两种消色散方法各有优劣。目前,我们对这两种消色散方法有定性的认识:相干消色散效果彻底,算法较简单,消色散后的信号时间分辨率较高,但是消色散后的数据量大,计算耗时多;非相干消色散后的数据量小,计算耗时少,而算法较复杂,消色散不彻底,消色散后的信号时间分辨率低。在脉冲星天文领域,部分国内外学者,已经用某些脉冲星信号比较过这两种消色散方法,得到一些消色散效果比较结论。但是都没有系统的比较研究过。 本文从计算耗时和消色散效果了两个方面比较这两种消色散方法。思路是用MATLAB程序先模拟色散的基带信号,而后实现两种消色散算法,最后有消色散后的信号的加色散之前的基带信号的相关系数比较两种方法的消色散效果。根据这些相关系数,在设定一定门限的条件下,确定两种方法消色散效果相同时的观测起始频率。本论文的结构是:第1章介绍理论背景和研究进展;第2章叙述研究所使用的理论、方法和工具;第3章进行数据处理和分析,得出研究结论;第4章将总结本研究的成果, 展望下一阶段的研究计划。
其他摘要Since the first pulsar was discovered in 1967, its extreme physical state and precisely periodic signals have been the focus of our attention. And currently the periodic signal of pulsars is the unique probe for obtaining the information of the pulsar. The signal disperses when it reaches our observation equipment through the interstellar medium. To obtain the original signal of the pulsar, the observed pulsar signal must be de-dispersed, at the same time, the accuracy of pulsar timing will be improved. Nowadays, there are two kinds of de-dispersion methods: coherent de-dispersion and incoherent de-dispersion. Incoherent de-dispersion, based on time series, uses the filter component channel to shift the time domain sequence corresponding to a single channel to remove dispersion; coherent de-dispersion, in the frequency domain, remove dispersion in the whole passband by utilizing the transfer function of the intersatellite medium. In principle, the two methods of de-dispersion have advantages and disadvantages. At present, we have a qualitative understanding of that two methods: by contrast, the coherent de-dispersion algorithm is relatively simple, the de-dispersion effect is prefect, and the time resolution of the signal after de-dispersion is higher, but the amount of data after de-dispersion is larger, and the calculation is time-consuming. On the contrary, the amount of data after incoherent de-dispersion is smaller, the calculation time is less, yet the algorithm is more complex, de-dispersion is not complete, and the time resolution of signal after dispersion removal is lower. In the fields of pulsar research, there are some domestic and international scholars who compared these two methods of eliminating dispersion with some pulsar signals and obtained some comparative results. However, there is scare to systematic research on that. This paper compares these two methods of de-dispersion in terms of computational time-consuming and the effect of de-dispersion. The idea is as follow: in the first place, I will apply MATLAB program to simulate the dispersion of the baseband signal, and then to achieve two kinds of de-dispersion algorithm, finally the correlation coefficient of the baseband signal before adding dispersion and the signal after removing dispersion, which is used to compare the effect to that two methods. Based on these correlation coefficients, under the condition of setting a certain threshold, the starting frequency of observation, which the two methods have the same dispersion-removing effect on, is determined. The structure of this paper is that, firstly, Chapter 1 introduces the theoretical background and research progress; secondly, Chapter 2 describes the theory, methods and tools used in the research; thirdly, Chapter 3 conducts data processing and analysis, and draws conclusions; in, the end, Chapter 4 will summarize the present the results of the study and look forward the next step of the research.
学科领域天文学 ; 射电天文学 ; 射电天文方法
学科门类理学 ; 理学::天文学
页数66
语种中文
文献类型学位论文
条目标识符http://ir.ynao.ac.cn/handle/114a53/25396
专题射电天文研究组
作者单位中国科学院云南天文台
第一作者单位中国科学院云南天文台
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
黄玉祥. 脉冲星相干消色散与非相干消色散的比较研究[D]. 北京. 中国科学院大学,2018.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
脉冲星相干消色散与非相干消色散的比较研究(4869KB)学位论文 开放获取CC BY-NC-SA浏览 请求全文
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[黄玉祥]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[黄玉祥]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[黄玉祥]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: 脉冲星相干消色散与非相干消色散的比较研究.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。